Welcome to Counterpoint
The Journal of Science and the Law
new Article:
|
Widmark's Formula
You may have heard your jurisdiction's Forensic Toxicologists say that they have used Widmark's Formula to calculate your client's BAC at a specific point in time. What is that formula, how is it properly employed, and what are its limitations? More importantly, are they really using that formula? 
|
Subscribe today to Volume 4 of Counterpoint:
Volume 4 of Counterpoint is here!
Make sure to continue your annual subscription - $130 CDN ($99 USD)
(Regular members of the DUIDLA will automatically receive Volume 4 - no need to renew)
Make sure to continue your annual subscription - $130 CDN ($99 USD)
(Regular members of the DUIDLA will automatically receive Volume 4 - no need to renew)
Why subscribe to Counterpoint?
|
You want to make a difference for your client. Your practice is enhanced when you understand today's forensics. Establishing scientific literacy is the key. The advantages of Counterpoint for your practice are clear:
|
HEAR WHAT SUBSCRIBERS SAY:
"Just a note to say what an astonishing value DUIDLA membership is. I’ve been a student member for two years, and was already overwhelmed with the value, but only in the past few days have I begun finally reading the Counterpoint Journal articles. They are tremendous. The specific article that compelled me to write this email is “An Introduction to Retrograde Extrapolation” by Deandra Grant, Volume 1, Issue 3, Summer 2016.
I don’t yet really understand the science — I’ll have to read it several times when I’m less tired. But the article lays out what I really need even if I don’t fully get the science — exactly how to expose this pseudoscience that I instinctively know it to be to a jury. Thank you Deandra Grant and Jan Semenoff. I am now assisting a great Delaware criminal defense attorney, and because of you, I should be truly useful to him, and ready to go out on my own before long. You cut years off the learning curve. Thanks again for your incredible labor of love. Lawyers without this information are handicapping themselves."
- Patrick W., Delaware
I don’t yet really understand the science — I’ll have to read it several times when I’m less tired. But the article lays out what I really need even if I don’t fully get the science — exactly how to expose this pseudoscience that I instinctively know it to be to a jury. Thank you Deandra Grant and Jan Semenoff. I am now assisting a great Delaware criminal defense attorney, and because of you, I should be truly useful to him, and ready to go out on my own before long. You cut years off the learning curve. Thanks again for your incredible labor of love. Lawyers without this information are handicapping themselves."
- Patrick W., Delaware
